Thursday, March 31, 2011


The picture of a lifetime: Mother captures the magical moment a rainbow forms over her young son's head 

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Last updated at 9:25 AM on 31st March 2011


It is without doubt the picture of a lifetime: a rainbow forming in all its colourful glory as a young boy looks out over the rocks and out to sea.

Avena Singh realised she only had seconds to capture the image as she and her three-year-old son explored the Shore Acres State Park in Oregon.

But she managed to fire off a quick photograph before the splash from a wave caused the incredible effect to disappear before their every eyes.

rainbow
Stunning: Avena Singh was taking pictures at a botanical garden when a rainbow formed
Mrs Singh, 35, a college worker and amateur photographer from Oregon, was thrilled when she viewed the photos later to see she had recorded the scene in full technicolour. 

'The park is only a few miles from our home and the weather report was for high waves so I knew there was going to be some spectacular shots. The sun was out and the waves were absolutely huge,' she said.

'I had noticed remnants of rainbows once in a while when the waves crashed and was trying to capture them with little success. A couple of photographer friends were with me and got my son, Rishabh, to pose as the waves hit.

'After they took their photos they turned away. I was standing right behind my son and saw the rainbow bend right over him. It was astonishing. I started snapping photos madly hoping to capture it all. 

'The remnants of the wave just fell straight down, and the rainbow disappeared as quickly as it had come. My son stood perfectly still in complete awe of what he discovered, his very own rainbow.

'After I took the photo, I realised my friends had been too busy chatting to notice what happened. I was overjoyed when I uploaded the images to my computer and was able to see them in all their glory, it was something I could never replicate.'

She added: 'It felt amazing. Having my son be right in the middle only made it more special. My children are everything in the world to me and had my son not been there it still would not have been as special.'

 
=============================

Unrest in the Arab World:Syria


Syria Offers Changes Before Renewed Protests

European Pressphoto Agency
Wrecked and ransacked shops in the Syrian city of Latakia, where security forces opened fire on protesters on Wednesday.
CAIRO — As Syria braced for renewed antigovernment demonstrations, the government announced new measures on Thursday seemingly aimed at addressing the protesters’ demands.
Multimedia
1 of 6
The Libyan Rebellion
Interactive map of the major clashes in Libya, day by day.

    Related in Opinion

    Hussein Malla/Associated Press
    A doctor treated a man who was wounded during violence between security forces and protesters in Latakia on Sunday.
    The New York Times
    The government in Damascus is adopting a hard line.
    But analysts said they were doubtful that the changes, coming a day after President Bashar al-Assad pointedly refused to make concessions, would amount to more than window dressing, and activists promised to go ahead with plans for a nationwide protest on Friday.
    The protest could be a critical test of the strength of the movement, which in a little over two weeks has posed an unprecedented challenge to the four-decade iron rule of the Assad family.
    The police and the military have responded aggressively to check the protests; activists say at least 103 people have died. Mr. Assad’s speech to the nation on Wednesday, in which he called the protesters dupes and agents of a foreign conspiracy, left little doubt that the hard line would continue.
    Ammar al-Qurabi, a Syrian activist currently in Cairo, said the speech and the violence of the last two weeks could discourage some from protesting on Friday, but he said he remained optimistic.
    “People are afraid to protest tomorrow, but there are many who are upset about the speech and what is happening in the country right now, and a good many of them will not be afraid to take to the street,” he said.
    “Of course I am nervous; my people are being killed in the street,” he added. “The president’s speech was very threatening.”
    Mr. Assad, in his first public address since the unrest began, said the democracy protests were merely a disguise for a foreign conspiracy to “fragment Syria, to bring down Syria as a nation, to enforce an Israeli agenda.”
    He acknowledged popular demands for reform but insisted that protesters had been “duped” into damaging the nation on behalf of its enemies, and vowed that the country would not bow to foreign pressure.
    “It is clear from Bashar’s speech that he is threatening Syrians who go to the street,” said Radwan Ziadeh, a Syrian human rights activist and visiting scholar at George Washington University in Washington. “He ended the speech by saying, ‘This is a battle and we are ready to fight it.’ But against who?”
    That question appeared to be answered just hours after the speech, when security forces opened fire upon pro-democracy demonstrators in the coastal city of Latakia, a stronghold of the ruling Baath Party and the Shiite Alawi sect that dominates it. Witnesses and activists gave conflicting reports of from 2 to 15 protesters killed.
    In one video posted to YouTube, protesters in Latakia can be seen and heard chanting, “The people just want freedom.” In a second, screaming demonstrators carry bloody bodies down the street.
    Nonetheless, the Facebook group Syrian Revolution 2011, which has more than 100,000 fans, urged Syrians to take to the streets on Friday. “What we have understood from the speech is that we have no choice but to remove the regime,” the group said in a statement posted Thursday.
    Mr. Assad’s harsh words on Wednesday contrasted with the conciliatory tone of two government announcements on Thursday creating new committees to address the protesters’ concerns.
    One committee was appointed to investigate deaths in Dara’a and Latakia, two cities where the government has cracked down on protesters, according to the state news agency. Syrian Human Rights Information Link, an activist organization, has documented the names of 103 people killed across the country since the protests began March 15, including at least 73 in Dara’a and 10 in Latakia. It was not clear if the number for Latakia included those killed Wednesday night.
    The government also announced the creation of a committee to study lifting the emergency law imposed in 1963 and replacing it with legislation “that secures the preservation of the country’s security, the dignity of citizens and combating terrorism,” according to the state news agency.
    Lifting the emergency law has been a major demand of the protesters. Among its provisions, the law silences dissent and allows security forces to detain citizens without charge.
    Activists expressed little faith that the government would expand political freedoms in any meaningful way. Mr. Ziadeh said he feared that replacing emergency law with antiterrorism laws would constitute only a cosmetic change. “They will put the same restrictions on basic rights into the terrorism law that they put into the emergency law,” he said. “The emergency law might be lifted but the state of emergency that governs every aspect of our lives will be the same."

    Libya News:


    Revealed: Gaddafi envoy in Britain for secret talks

    Exclusive: Contact with senior aide believed to be one of a number between Libyan officials and west amid signs regime may be looking for exit strategy
    All today's developments in Libya
    Libyan fixer's visit to London may show sons want way out
    Those who have defected – and those who still support Gaddafi
    Gaddafi supporters stage a rally in Tripoli
    Supporters of the Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi stage a rally in Tripoli. Photograph: Zohra Bensemra/Reuters
    Colonel Gaddafi's regime has sent one of its most trusted envoys to London for confidential talks with British officials, the Guardian can reveal.

    Mohammed Ismail, a senior aide to Gaddafi's son Saif al-Islam, visited London in recent days, British government sources familiar with the meeting have confirmed. The contacts with Ismail are believed to have been one of a number between Libyan officials and the west in the last fortnight, amid signs that the regime may be looking for an exit strategy.

    Disclosure of Ismail's visit comes in the immediate aftermath of the defection to Britain of Moussa Koussa, Libya's foreign minister and its former external intelligence head, who has been Britain's main conduit to the Gaddafi regime since the early 1990s.

    A team led by the British ambassador to Libya, Richard Northern, and MI6 officers embarked on a lengthy debriefing of Koussa at a safe house after he flew into Farnborough airport on Wednesday night from Tunisia. Government sources said the questioning would take time because Koussa's state of mind was "delicate" after he left his family in Libya.

    The Foreign Office has declined "to provide a running commentary" on contacts with Ismail or other regime officials. But news of the meeting comes amid mounting speculation that Gaddafi's sons, foremost among them Saif al-Islam, Saadi and Mutassim, are anxious to talk. "There has been increasing evidence recently that the sons want a way out," said a western diplomatic source.

    Although he has little public profile in Libya or internationally, Ismail is recognised by diplomats as being a key fixer and representative for Saif al-Islam. According to cables published by WikiLeaks, Ismail represented Libya's government in arms purchase negotiations and as an interlocutor on military and political issues.

    "The message that was delivered to him is that Gaddafi has to go, and that there will be accountability for crimes committed at the international criminal court," a Foreign Office spokesman told the Guardian , declining to elaborate on what else may have been discussed.

    Some aides working for Gaddafi's sons, however, have made it clear that it may be necessary to sideline their father and explore exit strategies to prevent the country descending into anarchy.

    One idea the sons have reportedly suggested – which the Guardian has been unable to corroborate – is that Gaddafi give up real power. Mutassim, presently the country's national security adviser, would become president of an interim national unity government which would include the opposition. It is an idea, however, unlikely to find support among the rebels or the international community who are demanding Gaddafi's removal.

    The revelation that contacts between Britain and a key Gaddafi loyalist had taken place came as David Cameron hailed the defection of Koussa as a sign the regime was crumbling. "It tells a compelling story of the desperation and the fear right at the very top of the crumbling and rotten Gaddafi regime," he said.

    Ministers regard Koussa's move to abandon his family as a sign of the magnitude of his decision. "Moussa Koussa is very worried about his family," one source said. "But he did this because he felt it was the best way of bringing down Gaddafi."

    Britain learned that Koussa wanted to defect when he made contact from Tunisia. He had made his way out of Libya in a convoy of cars after announcing he was going on a diplomatic mission to visit the new government in Tunis.

    It was also reported that Ali Abdussalam Treki, a senior Libyan diplomat, declined to take up his appointment by Gaddafi as UN ambassador, condemning the "spilling of blood". Officials were checking reports that Tarek Khalid Ibrahim, the deputy head of mission in London, is also defecting.

    The prime minister insisted that no deal had been struck with Koussa and that he would not be offered immunity from prosecution. "Let me be clear, Moussa Koussa is not being granted immunity. There is no deal of that kind," Cameron said. Within hours of his arrival in Britain, Scottish prosecutors asked to interview Koussa about the 1988 Lockerbie bombing. The Crown Office in Edinburgh has said that it is formally asking for its prosecutors and police detectives to question him.

    But government sources indicated that Britain does not believe Koussa was involved. He was at the heart of Britain's rapprochement with Libya, which started when Tripoli abandoned its support for the IRA in the early 1990s.

    He was instrumental in persuading Gaddafi to abandon his weapons of mass destruction programme in 2003. One source said: "Nobody is saying this guy was a saint, because he was a key Gaddafi lieutenant who was kicked out of Britain in 1980 for making threats to kill Libyan dissidents. But this is the guy who persuaded Gaddafi to abandon his WMD programme. He no doubt has useful and interesting things to say about Lockerbie, but it doesn't seem he said 'go and do it'."

    However there is unease among Tories about Britain's involvement in Libya. Underlining those concerns, Boris Johnson, the London mayor, told BBC Question Time that a continued stalemate in Libya could "have terrible consequences". Johnson said; "I do worry that if we get into a stalemate; and if, frankly, the rebels don't seem to be making the progress that we would like, we have to be brave, to say to ourselves that our policy is not working, and encourage the Arabs themselves to take leadership in all of this."

    William Hague, the foreign secretary, said he had a sense that Koussa was deeply unhappy with Gaddafi when they spoke last Friday. "One of the things I gathered between the lines in my telephone calls with him, although he of course had to read out the scripts of the regime, was that he was very distressed and dissatisfied by the situation there," Hague said.
    (source:guardian.co.uk)
    ==============================================

    Libya News:

    In Libya’s rebel base, a mix of hope and fear
    Gallery: Conflict and chaos in Libya: As international airstrikes continue against forces loyal to Moammar Gaddafi, rebels face difficult battle.
    BENGHAZI, Libya — On one Saturday, residents saw a burning airplane fall over their city as tanks shelled their homes.


    Video
    
Without proper training and formal command structure, the anti-Gaddafi forces are firing at random in self-defense. (March 31)
    Video: Without proper training and formal command structure, the anti-Gaddafi forces are firing at random in self-defense. (March 31)
    Graphic
    
Follow how events are unfolding in Libya.
    Graphic: Follow how events are unfolding in Libya.
    More On This Story
    Eight days later they were kept up all night by celebratory gunfire and rocket blasts as rumors circulated, falsely, that Col. Moammar Gaddafi’s home town had fallen to the rebel army.
    Benghazi, Libya’s second-largest city and the stronghold of the uprising that swept through the nation six weeks ago, is suspended in a delicate balance between exuberance and apprehension.
    On one hand the city is home to a cadre of highly educated, professional and cosmopolitan leaders who speak confidently of a democratic state to come, and cultivate international partners to help bring that state to fruition. Gaddafi, they swear, will fall in a week or so and a glorious new Libya will rise.
    But 100 miles to the west, a ragged collection of untrained civilians struggles in an uneven battle to keep government tanks at bay. Since midweek, as Gaddafi’s forces have crept closer, Benghazi residents have gone to bed wondering whether they will wake to a city under siege.
    “I just want a normal life,” said Mohammad el-Sayed, 27, a lecturer at Benghazi’s Technical Engineering College, as he drove down a road where light poles and highway overpasses bore the scars of missile attacks. “I want this to be over. We just want everything to be stable.”
    But the only thing certain in Benghazi is that nothing is certain. With a battle line that races erratically backward and forward up the coastal road, even fighters returning from the front cannot say for sure what is happening there.
    Government spokespeople give press conferences almost daily to a crush of journalists hungry for news. But for this fledgling government, solid information is hard to come by. The officials try to answer questions about how the new Transitional National Council plans to develop education, infrastructure and a viable economy, while at the same time hoping each day that there will still be a country to develop. Libyans will win their independence, they declare, while at the same time acknowledging that the rebel army is in danger of annihilation without help from NATO.
    “They’re doing the most with the least,” said Ahmed Hnesh, 29, a Libyan-American resident of Falls Church who came here in February to help with the uprising. “They’re creating a state from scratch.”
    In this city, whole neighborhoods are left unpaved, and building projects begun decades ago linger on in a state of half-constructed abandon.
    Benghazi residents are used to their crumbling infrastructure. What is new for them is the strange juxtaposition of urgency and idleness the rebellion has wrought.
    All around the city, newly minted fighters zoom by in pickup trucks hastily fitted with antitank artillery and swathed in the red, black and green flag of Libyan independence. They crackle with a sense of purpose, if not a clear idea of how to carry it out.
    Meanwhile, teachers, students, architects and traders sleep late and wonder when their schools and companies will reopen. On many blocks, only a few stores are open; the rest have metal gates pulled down while their owners wait for more tranquil times.
    And amid the triumphant freedom anthems on the radio, the effigies of Gaddafi hanging in front of the courthouse, the “Game Over” and “No More Dictator” tags spray-painted on downtown buildings, a sense of foreboding lingers.
    Gaddafi’s forces are not only in the tanks down the road. Some still live among the people of Benghazi. They are the neighbors who were once members of Gaddafi’s Revolutionary Committees, which helped promote their leader and kept tabs on those who didn’t.
    “We know who was on these committees,” Sayed said. “Now, of course, they are saying they support the revolution, but we don’t know.”
    Sniper attacks two weeks ago on a Benghazi radio personality and a cartoonist, both outspoken promoters of the revolution, are attributed to Gaddafi loyalists.
    Such violence is one reason that few women walk the streets. Another is the random firing of automatic weapons by young revolutionaries who are overly excited to be picking up a gun for the first time.
    “All the women are home; they don’t feel safe right now,” said Ahmad Mohammad, 32, a businessman whose work has dried up since the uprising began in mid-February. “People are very afraid, very disturbed. . . . The feeling right now is it’s not safe, and people are afraid of what will happen tomorrow.”
    But at the same time, he has hope for better days. “We have a saying in Arabic: When it’s been tight,” he said, squeezing his fists together, “it will open wide.” He let his hands relax and fall away from each other. “And it will be good, inshallah.”
    bahrampourt@washpost.com
    ==============================================