Saturday, November 10, 2012

Confessions of a now-happy ex-gay !


I’m gay. Why did I marry a woman?

I knew I loved guys in high school and never stopped sleeping with them. But then I met a woman who fascinated me

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • more
  •  
I'm gay. Why did I marry a woman?
One early morning — Wednesday, March 28, 1951, to be exact, nine days after my twenty-first birthday — I was returning books to the university library, when my friend Betsy Fontana came into my line of vision. After one of her exaggerated and giggly smooching kisses, she introduced me to the woman with her. “This, Mary, my dear, is Charlie Beye, the biggest fag in Iowa City.”
I protested, although Mary seemed to take it as no more than Betsy’s normal flamboyance. We stood chatting, compulsive talkers all, until we remembered we were in a library. I was off on a walk around town with a wad of cash in my pocket, paying bills for my mother; it is hard to remember now a time when shop keepers appreciated cash in the till and there were no credit cards. Mary offered to accompany me, claiming, as I was to learn was typical of her, that she had “nothing to do.” Betsy trotted off to class, and we began our ascent from the library near the river up the hill to the town itself on the far side of the campus where the shops were located. We never stopped talking even to get our breath as we moved along placidly on our walk, but raced from topic to topic, oh, Lord, there was no stopping us. First it was Homer and Greek tragedy. Mary had read the “Iliad” and “Odyssey” closely, although, as she claimed, she was much too immersed in English literature to find time to learn Greek. Still she knew the poems well; I was impressed. I, on the other hand, had nothing to say about English literature, having shunted it aside in my intense pursuit of the ancient stuff. Ah, well, we turned to Tolstoy, a favorite of both of us, whom I had read in high school before I got caught up in classics, so we could argue over the philosophical bits in “War and Peace” and whether they were all that necessary and proclaim our love of “Anna Karenina.” And, oh, joy, we both had read lots and lots of Proust in high school as well; it took me all of my senior year. I was intoxicated by the endless stream of words pouring from both our mouths, spurred on to more and more outrageous word choices in response to Mary’s vocabulary. At last, an hour later, all bills had been paid, and I had something left over to allow me to invite Mary for toast and tea at Whetstone Drugstore where back in the day one could get refreshments. It was now nine o’clock. I had known her for one hour; I was enchanted. We stopped talking to tend to the tea, and I looked across the booth at her and recollected what I had noticed on our walk. She was short, fleshy, there were pleasing curves to her hips — pear-shaped, they used to call it — in symmetry with her round full breasts that her sweater revealed. Her skin tones had a definite copper cast, which went with her thick strawberry blond hair, worn shoulder-length. She wore lipstick, and eye shadow, and penciled her eyebrows. She was definitely not an Iowa City High School girl.
“This has been great,” I said. “I think we should get married.”
Mary did not hesitate at the suggestion but had a question in reply. “Have you ever slept with a woman?”
“Well, no. I haven’t.”
Still unperturbed, Mary contemplated the toast on her plate before saying, “Well, that would be basic in any marriage.”
“Then we shall have to do so, and the sooner the better,” I solemnly decreed. “In fact, perhaps a week from this coming Friday.”
The last part of this lunatic conversation was predicated on the coincidence that I was going to be sleeping alone in our house on that Friday night. My mother was about to move us into a small apartment, for which she had discarded a great quantity of household furnishings. This stuff was stacked in the garage, about to be sold in an auction on the lawn in front of our house. Friday night I would be a guard; the double bed on which I was to sleep in the empty house would be moved out to the auction on Saturday morning. My reader cannot possibly find this course of action any stranger or more inexplicable than its author does!
The walk that ended in Whetstone Drugstore cannot be explained. Most of the time Mary and I talked about emotional depression, as I remember. I told her of my experiences growing up gay, an abbreviated version of what is contained in the previous pages. She herself had known hostility, had her own tales of classmates’ negative reaction to her sexual freedom in another smalltown Iowa high school. Things hadn’t improved any, she told me, when she arrived at the university, where she made the mistake of thinking she could combine sex and friendship. If I was the town’s notorious cocksucker, she had to contend with her reputation as an easy lay. We both knew a lot about the same things, hurt, for instance, and social confusion, and sexual curiosity. We were also both able to put our experiences into a humorous perspective. We were so much alike; the thought of it threw me into a state of intense excitement.
Marriage? How did the idea pop into my head? The smalltown mores of my day dictated that no two people could live together unless they were married. I must have proposed marriage as the obvious status of intimacy. It is a commentary upon the sexless home of my childhood that I never stopped to consider the sexual component, until Mary laughingly asked whether I had slept with a woman. It is a commentary upon Mary that she did not immediately reject the idea of marriage to a gay male. She was spontaneous, reckless, devoid of calculation. The very moment was telling. Mary was a juvenile diabetic who needed daily injections of insulin to maintain her metabolic functions. There she was sitting in the drugstore with me smoking a cigarette, drinking coffee, and eating sugared cinnamon buttered toast. These were so many no-no’s, as I was to discover later, to which she was quite indifferent. Mary was up for experience; she exuded the perfume of transgression and it intoxicated me. I think that she was equally attracted to me, that she was willing to give the idea of marriage, ludicrous, crazy as it was, a try, so long as I passed a test in the basics. While sex was not at all central to her idea of friendship, Mary was not about to let go of it.
No amount of psychiatric discussion has ever gotten me any closer to why I did what I did, for which I had no regrets and pretty nearly total satisfaction during the four and a half years that remained of Mary’s life. Of course, cynics will always argue that any relationship cut short like that will look good. Think of Alfredo and Violetta in “La Traviata,” or, more to the point, gorgeous Robert Taylor and Greta Garbo in “Camille.” If Mary felt doomed, perhaps she communicated that desperate feeling at some level. It was all of a piece with the ancient Greek tragic sense of life. Well, I am sentimental, I know it, and perhaps I do glamorize the memory.
Oddly enough, I was not the slightest bit apprehensive about having sex with Mary. Once she had agreed to consider marriage, we began to act like any couple going steady, lots of necking, lots of kissing. At first it felt strange to me, touching her or holding her. Mary was small, and soft, and slightly fleshy. Boys were tall, hard, and muscular. Swelling, warm, sweet-smelling breasts had to be won through the challenge of the fortification of a brassiere. How much easier to dip one’s hand into a pair of jockey shorts. At this stage I equated breasts with pricks. These were the two appendages of gender that stuck out. My naturally strong libido responded to her flesh, considerably encouraged by her demonstrative affection and attractiveness. Mary was not embarrassed to put her hand on me, to rub my groin and arouse me. Somewhere in the mysteries of my sexual education at home I had learned that women were not aroused by the sight of men, nor were they willing to respond to men’s aggressive actions, but rather waited, quite passively, for the male’s arrival and entry. Mary was not like this; she was ready to ensure that her male’s equipment was ready for action. It was almost two weeks since we made this assignation, and I was certainly ready. Like an athlete in training I had kept myself from any contact with a male, had kept my hand off my dick. Friday night Mother was safely packed off to her new apartment. I had bought condoms and put beer in the refrigerator.
I was what I think is nowadays called “highly sexed,” and rather than feel terri ed, I was keen on the experiment, and as we entered the house and ascended the stairs I could sense the familiar twist and tightening of my undershorts as the blood began its journey. Mary had been relatively promiscuous since losing her virginity at sixteen and approached a new sexual encounter as simply part of a larger repertoire of interaction that she saw developing between two people who had already amply demonstrated a great gift for conversing on a very wide range of subjects with considerable rhetorical skill. The charge in that was certainly as strong as the physical attraction of two young naked people. I was not the least nonplussed by the demands of fitting on a condom, since the”married man with whom I had been sleeping two years earlier had insisted upon condoms until he felt sure that I was clean. It seemed ridiculous at the time, but on this particular night I was thankful for the experience.
The first great discovery of heterosexual intercourse for a veteran of the active role in homosexual anal intercourse was delight at the easy entry. I mounted, slid in, and there I was enveloped in Mary’s warm and moist interior. Later I was to be delighted that the vagina could accommodate a somewhat limp penis after its orgasm, allowing for some tentative thrusts to start toward a new crescendo. As I began to develop my rhythm, I was delighted to look down at her face, watching her breasts bobbing below me, feeling them crushed against my chest. The missionary position allowed me to feel my control of her body through my legs and pelvis. It was my show, I was a god and emperor and king, after all those years on my knees staring at a guy’s pubic hair as I went up and down on him, or if I was penetrating my partner more often than not confronting his shoulder blades, or when face- to-face having to manage the logistics of balance and stance, not to mention the need to have a harder-than-rock phallus for the penetration of the slightly off-kilter orifice. Oh, joy, oh, rapture, oh, bliss. It was a revelation to me, Mary’s continuing surge of sexual desire, matching my own, which until then I did not know I possessed, sharing as we did a reaction to orgasm by slowly moving gently, gently together to produce another. We could make love all night.
For the first time in my life I understood that a woman is a mystery. By this I mean I had complete familiarity with a male’s erotic responses because I myself was a male. A commonplace response of hitchhikers whom I had picked up on the transcontinental highway on their way home after demobilization was that I was better than any prostitute they had experienced in Paris or Hong Kong or wherever. It always seemed natural to me, because I was alert to every nuance of their mounting excitement since I knew it from my own experience. No matter how often a male may make love to a woman, if he takes their lovemaking seriously and tries to comprehend it, he will discover that he can never finally sense her response to his presence or to his actions because there is no true analogue to his own bodily responses, not even massaging the clitoris. More than anything else this was the great discovery for me.
I had been raised in a house of women, habituated to talk with them easily. My closest school chums were all women. I felt entirely comfortable with women. God knows I certainly knew the rhythm and frequency of the female menstrual cycle from early on. One of my long-standing anecdotes at the right sort of social gathering was describing my mother’s often-repeated request that I walk down to Pearson’s Drugstore to purchase Kotex for my many bleeding sisters, and my reluctance as a youth to expose myself to the snickers at my frequent appearance there on that mission, not to mention my wonderment at why they couldn’t get their own sanitary napkins; I mean, why me? Now for the first time I discovered at the deepest physical level my alienation from women whom I would never really know at all. Not for me Joan Crawford imitations or drag parties. Women were women and men were men. In bed with Mary I forgot myself: I was a conventional male person and in the process my penis took over from my mouth as the focus point. I think of the psychoanalyst Karen Horney’s remarks about male performance anxiety connected with the idea of the penis as a tool, and the fact that women can produce offspring without experiencing orgasm, but that men must perform to function biologically.
What is, of course, interesting in this distinction is that I had spent years bringing males to orgasm, experiencing this orgasm orally, controlling it in doing so; my mouth was my instrument. The shared experience of mating as I had sex with Mary, both of us excited together, both facing one another, moving together in response to my thrusting; it was so different from “giving” another guy an orgasmic experience, from the first stirrings through to the ecstatic convulsions, my action, his passivity — no performance anxiety for him, which is perhaps the fundamental allure of fellatio.
I did not see Mary again until Monday. After my morning’s work on Saturday I returned to assist Mother at her auction, then went with her to the new apartment to settle in. Monday, Mary and I met again at the drugstore, where she told me that she had spent Saturday night with her casual boyfriend. “I just wanted to be sure that I knew what I was doing,” she said with a laugh. “Yes, you and I had a great night of sex, but, you know, ‘forsaking all others,’ as the marriage service says. I just wanted to comparison-shop.”
I smiled, but I was scandalized; obviously the irony of my adhering to the double standard for males and females did not strike me. Immediately I felt vulnerable, although it was clear that whatever-his-name-was had not proved to be a serious rival. Within a week or so I met the guy when he went out for the evening with Mary and me. As we were driving her back to her dorm I felt him put his arm down upon mine, which was resting on the seat behind her, and his hand pressuring me. Once I bade her good night, Harvey and I drove to his apartment. On the way he introduced the idea of our forming a menage a trois, for which he had pedantically worked out the logistics. All that was needed, he concluded, was a demonstration of his capacity for homosexual sex. Harvey was the stereotypical ambitious, overachieving New York Jew, an exotic in Iowa, a commonplace in the East. Our time in bed was going to be an experiment. His two roommates, also Jews from New York, greeted us solemnly, then nervously and abruptly withdrew to their rooms, obviously aware of his great experiment. Harvey undressed, revealing a powerful, excited member attached to a well-formed hairy torso. I was immediately overpowered with the kind of desire I would never know with Mary. For the next several hours we tried it all. Harvey, the intrepid explorer, put his member wherever I directed, and, sometimes grimacing with pain, offered his every orifice for penetration, following my example, but it was finally clear that for Harvey, as the expression goes, “Once is curiosity, twice would be perversion. “That’s what I thought would happen,” said Mary.
Did I love her? people always ask me. I don’t know; I am not sure what love is. I liked her immensely, I valued her, I did not swoon over her. I suppose I did not love her in any conventional sense of the word. I certainly did not lust after her. Seeing her nude standing before me did not give me the charge a naked male would produce. We were married July 1, 1951; she died a little over four years later. We never had a devastating quarrel, although once I made Mary so angry that she left our bed in our one-room apartment and slept the night in the bathtub. We yelled and screamed and pouted on many occasions. Our sexual marathons gradually became less frequent and less intense, and finally the sex became more a placid release three times a week. We spent that final Sunday afternoon in bed making love four hours before she died. But in all those days of our life together we never stopped the conversations.
Our courtship lasted three months. I went up to Ames to meet her parents, Carl and Ruth Powers, and to ask for her hand in marriage, that old expression, but we felt old-fashioned to be getting married. It was not a sacrament, a ceremony, no, we saw it as a party event, a drama, a symbol of our relationship to act out. The wedding photos reveal a very young couple, handsome, shy, naive. My heart goes out to all that innocence as though I, the old man viewing them, had never been part of it. But then, everyone in the scenes seems so young, even my mother, who was only fifty-eight at that moment, just five years older than my eldest child today. My best man seems to be no more than fourteen, although of course he was my contemporary in college. We met through gay circles, I chose him as best man on impulse, really, because I was in another life from my adolescence, and a male from my high school class would carry associations I did not want then. Well, that’s what I would have said, perhaps did say, but the fact of the matter is that I had no close male friends from the high school days. He and I and Mary and her attendant drove up from Iowa City the day before the wedding, the ride broken by a longish boozy lunch in a restaurant on the banks of the Cedar River lazily flowing on its long journey to the Mississippi. That night we were nervous and had what we wanted, sandwiches, nothing more, made by Mary’s mother. Afterward we two men bade the ladies good night and went to the local hotel to spend the night. After a few drinks in the bar downstairs we decided to turn in. I was nervous; so was he. This was going to be a performance, and we wanted to do our best.
We sat on the edge of our beds in our underpants to discuss it, and as so often happens in scenes such as these the inherent physical attraction of two males almost nude with the added titillation of mounded flesh seen through white cotton fabric caused them to disrobe completely and act on their desire. And that, I suppose, could be called my bachelor party.
I kissed most of the boys goodbye in the two months leading up to the wedding. For example, my former dueling partner in the high school play, now a university student, to whom I had given considerable help with his term papers in exchange for sexual favors, dropped by my mother’s apartment one day when she was out. He no doubt imagined that he could get a paper from me as he had before, but this time without having to put out. As I sat on the floor next to him poring over the papers and notes he had brought with him, his thighs, his shoulders and chest, his breath and smell deranged my thoughts. I ran my hand up his leg. Minutes later we were naked on my bed, a threatening headache was gone, and I felt a kind of peace of fulfillment that told me something true about myself that I was willing to accept but not to articulate.
I said goodbye to my married friend, who encouraged me to try it straight for a bit — to “get the hang of it.” I said goodbye to the big college athlete who took it up the ass and tried to deny it meant anything; yet when we met for the last time, the two of us sitting naked on his bed, he staring moodily at the floor while I looked out the window, he asked, “But what about me?” I didn’t know, nor do I know now how he worked out his life. The star high school athlete, my weekly companion of so many years, now a married man, I could not let go. He continued to see me from time to time; in fact, on the very day a year later when Mary and I were leaving Iowa City for Cambridge, Massachusetts, and graduate school, he came by when she was at work “just to say goodbye,” and sat across from me staring me in the eye, slowly unzipping his fly, knowing that I could not resist.
Excerpted from “My Husband and My Wives: A Gay Man’s Odyssey” by Charles Rowan Beye, published in October 2012 by Farrar, Straus and Giroux, LLC. Copyright ©2012 by Charles Rowan Beye. All rights reserved.

5 habits that harm

Nov 10, 2012, 12.00AM IST TNNHarshada Rege ]
=====================================================

5 habits that harm
Everyday habits you never thought would be bad for your health

We already know that tucking into junk/ roadside food, smoking, biting your nails and sleeping late are bad and avoidable habits. But did you know that some of your innocent habits could be causing you harm? Here are some daily habits that are bad for your health...

Fibbing
Small white lies or lying through your teeth — we all do it sometimes. However, here's what you should know. Studies say that all those little lies are actually bad for your mental health. Researchers say that when you lie, you generate feelings of stress, which are bad for you. When you lie less, you suffer from less headaches, sore throats and even anxiety.

Missing out on lunch breaks
No matter how busy you are, skipping your lunch break and opting to eat on your desk is a big no-no. Not only is missing out on breaks bad for your stress levels, eating in a hurry when you're distracted results in overeating. Being physically inactive also increases the chances of being exposed to harmful bacteria. Studies say that the place where you sit at work contains nearly 400 times more germs than the average toilet seat. Still feel like eating there now?

Diligently doing housework
Yes, you read that right. Sometimes when you feel like taking a break and skipping housework, and feel guilty about it, here's something that will cheer you up. Research suggests that procrastinating the housework for a day can actually give your health a boost. When you do housework after a long day at work, it prevents levels of cortisol, the stress hormone, from lowering and reduces recovery from stress. Take turns to do the housework so that you don't burn yourself out and make sure you take some time out to relax afterwards.

Using ATMs regularly
Surprised? Ever wondered how many people use ATMs? While withdrawing money from ATM machines is a common habit, tests have revealed that these machines are almost as dirty as public toilets. Experts said the key pads on ATM machines have the same type of bacteria that are found in public rest rooms. Ensure that you use a hand sanitiser or wash your hands after using them.

Ditching friends
While it's okay to cancel plans with friends, once in a while due to unavoidable circumstances or because you want some alone time, doing it frequently is bad news. While personal time is good for your mental and physical health, spending too much time on your own is actually bad for you. Experts say that having strong social bonds promotes brain health, reduces feelings of depression, lowes stress levels and also encourages you to look after your health.

Email this article to a Friend
================================================

NASA testing 'interplanetary Internet'

  • astronaut-sunita-williams-100-days

    Expedition 33 commander Sunita "Suni" Williams takes part in an interview with collectSPACE.com from on board the International Space Station on Oct. 19, 2012. (NASA TV)

  • space-station-internet-robot-mocup
    Astronauts on the International Space Station used an interplanetary Internet to control the Mocup test robot at the European Space Agency's Space Operations Center in Germany in October 2012. The test could one day help astronauts explore othe (ESA)
NASA and the European Space Agency have tested out a prototype system that may one day help enable Internet-like communications between Earth and robots on another planet.
Astronaut Sunita Williams, commander of the International Space Station's current Expedition 33 mission, used NASA's experimental Disruption Tolerant Networking (DTN) protocol to drive a small LEGO robot at the European Space Operations Center in Germany late last month.

=================================
'It may one day be used by humans on a spacecraft in orbit around Mars to operate robots on the surface.'
- Badri Younes, NASA space communications
=================================

The European-led experiment simulated a scenario in which an astronaut orbiting another world controls a robotic rover on the planet's surface, NASA officials said.
"The demonstration showed the feasibility of using a new communications infrastructure to send commands to a surface robot from an orbiting spacecraft and receive images and data back from the robot," Badri Younes, deputy associate administrator for space communications and navigation at NASA Headquarters in Washington, said in a statement.
"The experimental DTN we've tested from the space station may one day be used by humans on a spacecraft in orbit around Mars to operate robots on the surface, or from Earth using orbiting satellites as relay stations," Younes added.
NASA's DTN architecture is a new technology designed to enable standardized communications over long distances and through time delays, agency officials said. At its core is something called the Bundle Protocol (BP), which is similar to the Internet Protocol, or IP, that serves as the heart of the Internet here on Earth.
The big difference between the two is that IP assumes a seamless end-to-end data path, while BP is built to account for errors and disconnections — glitches that commonly plague deep-space communications.
Data move through the BP network in a series of short hops, waiting at one node until the next link becomes available, NASA officials said.
The space station's current Expedition 33 consists of six crewmembers: NASA astronauts Williams and Kevin Ford, Japanese spaceflyer Akihiko Hoshide and Russian cosmonauts Yuri Malenchenko, Evgeny Tarelkin and Oleg Novitskiy.
Copyright 2012 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/11/09/space-station-astronaut-drives-robot-on-earth-via-interplanetary-internet/#ixzz2BnyRWg00

Vijay Mallya's last stand

Vijay Mallya's last stand
Selling his crown jewel United Spirits
Vijay Mallya
Vijay Mallya
BANGALORE/MUMBAI: "I feel sorry for him" or "he has my sympathies" are not the phrases you would ordinarily associate with as flamboyant a person as Vijay Mallya. But, indeed, they cropped up often when talking to a large number of people who have known him personally and professionally for this story.

Sympathy that less than two weeks after publicly, almost defiantly, proclaiming that he would not sell family silver to fund his grounded airline Kingfisher, he had to do precisely that. A sense of sorrow for a man who has been felled by hubris. Or, as an associate memorably put it, through "nasha."

Mallya was always a high-stakes business operator. He built the liquor and beer businesses he inherited from his father, the late Vittal Mallya, at the young age of 28 in 1983, not only into dominant market players in India but in the case of the former into the world's largest drinks company by volume. Much of the growth was fuelled by debt. His heavily leveraged balance sheets would have felled a lesser mortal but Mallya sailed through with minor hiccups though 'Is Mallya broke?' has been a constant refrain among the chatterati and corporate chieftains for two decades now. Alas, a similar tactic did not work in the airline that he launched with much fanfare on his son Sidhartha's 18th birthday in May 2005.

Standing personal guarantee to the debt raised by the airline and pledging much of his stake in other businesses to keep the airline afloat have today pushed him to sell the crown jewel in his portfolio: the liquor company, United Spirits, which has 50% of the Indian market and was the source of Mallya's clout: economic and political, and his flamboyant lifestyle.

"Vijay has an emotional and rational side to him. But somewhere in recent times he lost the sense of proportion allowing the Kingfisher crisis to spiral out of hand. He's extremely passionate about the businesses he built, not that he loved the inherited ones less. That's what made him stick out for a company (KFA) which was beyond any reasonable sense of business," says Ravi Jain, a joint venture partner and former managing director of Mallya's brewing unit, who used to drive Mallya and his ex-wife Sameera around Kolkata in his old fiat car.

Ramesh Vangal, who was outbid by Mallya for Shaw Wallace, believes, "This is the end of an era. He built an enormous business with great potential. Allowing it to fall into the hands of an MNC is a little of a regret. But it's the practical thing to do." Vangal, the former Pepsi senior executive who has interests in the Indian liquor industry, points out, "It's Karma actually. Vijay has seen the best of times. Now he's facing the most challenging. It's part of the circle of which we are all in. We learn as we go around."



Nobody doubts Mallya's intelligence or his ability to build a business or a brand. Especially the latter. Even the ill-starred KFA is a testimony to his brand-building prowess. "He had this terrific grasp of any situation and could talk straight however difficult it was," UB Bhat, a senior executive who worked with him in the 1980s, reminisces how the young Mallya flew into Bangalore from the United States 48 hours after his father's sudden demise. "He was hardly 28 then, and there were whispers that his father's close aides H P Bhagat or Srinivasa Rao could be considered for the role of chairman. He recovered swiftly to take charge of the affairs and went to create a strong corporate identity for the diversified businesses ( Herbertsons, Phipson, Kissan Foods, etc) his father had built. In the process, he brought several chieftains under his direct control just like what Ratan Tata managed within Tata Group," says Bhat, who was involved in organizing Mallya's first marriage to Sameera (formerly Sakina), sometimes doubling up as a priest, at a temple in Goa.

Jain argues, "He would have done this (Diageo) deal in the ordinary course, but now it's unfortunately seen as him being forced to sell the family business. The liquor market is changing and his own operations have become too big for him to manage alone. One can philosophically argue this is the beginning of retirement, and why not? He was at the top of his energy for thirty years."

Mallya's often described by those close to him as proverbially a man with nine lives. He's been in umpteen scrapes before and come out of it. While the general consensus is that his luck finally ran out, there are others who think by doing this deal with Diageo he's actually doing a smart thing, getting the 10th life perhaps.

K P Balasubramaniam, former chairman of Mysore Breweries (now SAB-Miller India) and an old Mallya friend from Bangalore believes, "It's a smart thing he's done. Diageo is a well run, profitable company. His 15% stake will appreciate in value and he will get good dividends. Same is the case with the beer business (where Heineken is the equal owner)."

A sentiment echoed by Kishore Chhabria with whom he settled long-standing disputes recently. Said he, "The good thing about him is that he continues to be lucky. He would have been gone without this deal, but he has pulled it off. A lot of people might say bechara mar gaya but watch out. His 15% stake will be worth far more in three years than 29% he had. This was a pragmatic deal to do. Good for him and good for the industry." Chhabria, the chairman of Allied Blenders & Distillers, the largest Indian-owned spirits company now, added, "I am sure he will enjoy playing the investor role from now on. People move on like the Singh brothers of Ranbaxy. There's no need to be emotional."

And emotional Mallya has never been about business. He's bought and sold businesses whenever he's seen value. He sold Kissan to Hindustan Lever, after dallying with Nestle a bit. Berger Paints was sold for a huge profit. He offloaded the brilliant portfolio he inherited from his dad - large stakes in Cabdury and Hoechst - saying there were not core to his business.

Nobody also disputes Mallya's generosity, large heartedness to his family and friends. Says a Bangalore corporate chieftain, "He's a very nice guy. Very generous. Never malicious. Unfortunately, a lot of people misuse that. There are lots of people who take advantage of his hospitality, fly in his planes, attend his parties and then snigger behind his back."

His flamboyant lifestyle - close associates say his personal life was never as colourful as made out by the media - the yachts, the planes, the cars, the horses, the girls, the islands, FI and IPL teams, multiple homes - in the end damned him in the public eye.

But all agree that the very expensive lifestyle - an apocryphal story has it that a big, global PE which did a due diligence when it was looking to invest in Kingfisher put the cost of the lifestyle at $60 million annually - would have to be piped down. Perhaps Mallya was readying for such a life with his recent tweets which suggested happiness at his loss of billionaire status.
=========================================


Friday, November 9, 2012

India: “Once upon a time, there was a King”


I remember ...

POOYAM THIRUNAL GOURI PARVATHI BAYI
SHARE  ·   COMMENT   ·   PRINT   ·   T+  
Pooyam Tirunal Gouri Parvathybai. In the backgound is a potrait of Sri Chitra Tirunal Balarama Varma. Photo: S. Gopakumar
The HinduPooyam Tirunal Gouri Parvathybai. In the backgound is a potrait of Sri Chitra Tirunal Balarama Varma. Photo: S. Gopakumar
Pooyam Tirunal Gouri Parvathi Bayi reminisces about her uncle Sri Chitra Tirunal Balarama Varma, the ruler of erstwhile Travancore. His birth centenary is being celebrated with a variety of cultural and social programmes
It is very hard to write about somebody you love very much, especially when that person is no longer physically with you. If I started a story about my uncle, I would do it in the traditional fairy tale mode: “Once upon a time, there was a King”. This King, who was the pivot of our lives, lived in a modest palace that was more a big white house on a hill rather than a turreted castle. He dressed in simple clothes with not a scrap of gold on his person.

His habits were simple too. Not for him silken sheets and golden plates. The traditional banana leaves, ‘plavila’ spoons and a thorthu tied round his waist as he sat on the floor on a mat for his meals, kanji rather than payasam, this is the actuality of what people imagine to be ‘royal banquets’. No mother could have wished for a more caring son and no family could have wished for a kinder ‘head’. For us ‘children’, he wove magic spells with wonderful stories that spanned a wide range of themes. Mythology, current affairs, history, civics, even medical knowledge and advice, cleverly disguised as a story entertained us every afternoon.
When I had measles as a little girl, I was taken care of by my uncle and my father because my mother had two little ones, my brother still a baby to look after. The gentle coaxing of the hated ‘podiarikanji’ into a resistant mouth and holding a hot little hand until I fell asleep when the fever was high. Proudly sporting a very imperfectly knitted green muffler that I had painstakingly crafted for his birthday, the hand-drawn and lettered cards he made for our birthdays…, a thousand memories come tumbling into my mind.

While other people took naps, uncle had his ‘children’s hour’. A secret stash of toffees awaited not only us but also visiting children who sometimes crawled under the half doors that led to his office from the visitors’ waiting room.

Summer vacations in the hills was our favourite time of the year. Our house in Peerumedu was relaxed and informal. We had wonderful picnics in the woods with grandmother [the late Sethu Parvathi Bayi] actually cooking on an improvised fireplace. Uncle hunted for twigs and broken branches with us to provide the firewood for her cooking. One week we would spend at Edapalayam, staying at our forest retreat which is now the Lake Palace Hotel. Suddenly one morning, the compound would be flooded by tribal people who lived in the forests in total harmony with nature and their four-footed neighbours. They came silently on foot and on rafts bearing gifts of wild honey, tubers and medicinal herbs. Return gifts of clothes awaited them and they melted back into the jungle, their going as quiet as their coming.

Sometimes, as a very special treat, the forest guards would guide us all on a walk to a tree house, a kilometre away from the Lake Palace. When the mists came rolling in, we all played indoor games in the flickering light of the generator. We had no computers, no mobile phones, no fast food outlets, not even television but we were happy.

Ours needs were few and simple and what we had, or rather what we were given, we were taught to appreciate and be thankful for. Good manners were insisted upon. We stood up automatically when an older person came into the room, we had to say ‘please’ and ‘thank you’ and, most importantly, we had to be ready on time if we were going anywhere. Not ready on time meant getting left behind. Needless to add, this did not happen often. I remember my uncle standing up when his old nursemaid Narayani Amma came to visit, after she had retired. She would scold him for being too thin and he would accept her strictures meekly, as if he was still in her charge!

Uncle shared a love for good chocolates with all the generations of children who were privileged to be cherished by him. He remembered that when he was a child, ‘foreign food’ was frowned upon and he and his cousins would hide in the garden to consume this European delicacy! He had a great sense of humour and never hesitated to poke fun at himself.
Both the elders in our family, grandmother and uncle, had a very progressive outlook and encouraged us to think independently. When I went to college for the first time, they were as excited as I was and were eager to share my experiences and impressions. I loved to dance and when I was given a part in the College Day programme, the teachers were doubtful if ‘palace permission’ would be forthcoming. Not only was permission readily granted but I had to come home in my stage outfit for them to ‘admire’. Many so-called well-wishers objected to ‘the princess being let loose on a public stage’. A gently raised eyebrow from my uncle was all it took to silence these protesters.

So many memories crowd my thoughts at this time of my uncle’s centenary which falls on November 12. He did not care for big celebrations and statues and posters. It was only to please his family and not to deny his mother’s wish that made him remain silent when the medical centre to mark his 60th birthday was named after him. His only comment when the name became a fait accompli was to request that a research wing be added to the medical institute. As he turned more and more towards Lord Padmanabha, he became truly detached from the turmoil of daily life. He faced life with smiling equanimity and truly wished everyone well. ‘Loka samastha sukhino bhavanthu’, he repeated at bedtime. Let this wish he had for all creation, this benediction he left for posterity come true one day. After all these years we feel orphaned by his passing but blessed by his love and I am proud to be his niece.

As part of the centenary celebrations, a Vishnu Sahasranamajapam has been organised at the Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple on November 12 (Monday) from 4 p.m. onwards. All devotees are welcome to participate. This, I feel, is the actual 100th birth anniversary day of uncle.

I also hope to organise, during the course of the year, medical aid for 100 children below the age of 10, coming from all parts of Kerala and former Travancore, including Kanyakumari district.

================================================

Baby wrens use a secret password to be fed !


Baby wrens must chirp a secret password to be fed, study finds

  • Email
    Share
Fairy wren.
A study shows that fairy-wren nestlings learn a password while still in the egg that they must chirp to be fed by their mothers. (Colombelli-Negrel et al. / Current Biology)






=========================================================
The nestlings of fairy-wrens don’t have much of a choice when it comes to listening to their mothers: The birds must reproduce a particular sound learned from their moms to be fed, according to a study published Thursday in the journal Current Biology.
The researchers, led by Sonia Kleindorfer of Flinders University in Australia, call the sound the bird’s “learned password.”
The team discovered the remarkable mother-chick ritual by chance when they noticed that the mothers were aiming calls at their eggs well before they hatched. So they set out to determine why. First, the researchers realized that the call made by the nestlings in order to be fed was different in each nest, suggesting it might be learned.
The pieces began to come together when the team also observed that each nest’s begging call — the password the nestlings need — was contained within the call that the mothers made to their unhatched eggs. In order to prove that the chicks were learning the sound from their moms rather than the song being innate, Kleindorfer and her team swapped the eggs from two different nests. Once hatched, the chicks produced the begging call of their foster moms, not their birth moms, proof the call was in fact learned in the egg.
Finally, to prove that the call was related to feeding, the researchers placed a speaker next to the nest and played sounds that made it impossible for the mother to hear the begging call. By disrupting the password, they were able to prevent feeding.
Kleindorfer and her team believe this intricate back-and-forth between mother and nestling developed to prevent another species of bird — parasitic cuckoos — from invading the nest and stealing the fairy-wrens’ food.


The findings may have implications for species evolution, suggesting that traits we once believed were genetically passed down may in fact be learned. In other words, the authors write, “There is now no doubt that some seemingly innate traits are the result of experience during the embryonic stages.”
Return to the Science Now blog.
====================================================